Just realized that D&D 3.5 came out in June of 2003, so turns 21 this month.
Whatever issues with the system, 3ed really updated the venerable AD&D 2nd, and then 3.5 took all those new ideas and cleaned them up.
So I'll raise a glass on your 21st.
View attachment 369657
3ed was the start of the Hardcover-a-Month era. I don't think it would have been possible to go for 10 years, and then only have an update.I sometimes wonder what would have happened if 3.5 would have come out 10 years after 3e, rather than just a few. Would we still be playing a more complex D&D? Would 4E ever have happened? What would have happened to the d20/OGL industry without the huge shakeup that 3.5 was?
::laughs in Pathfinder 1E::3ed was the start of the Hardcover-a-Month era. I don't think it would have been possible to go for 10 years, and then only have an update.
This is honest curiosity, not a trap - which part of it would you be looking to simplify?I was just discussing with a friend if it might be easier to go back and simplify 3e than it would be to make 5e into what we want. So while I never fully adopted 3.5 (I just took what I wanted and/or houseruled a 3.25 compromise) I still think it was a good enough rule set to work with even if I don’t want all the bells and whistles.
Well then it was old enough to drink years ago!Just realized that D&D 3.5 came out in June of 2003, so turns 21 this
I was just discussing with a friend if it might be easier to go back and simplify 3e than it would be to make 5e into what we want. So while I never fully adopted 3.5 (I just took what I wanted and/or houseruled a 3.25 compromise) I still think it was a good enough rule set to work with even if I don’t want all the bells and whistles.