Pictures a Technomancer neatly and casually taking apart a machine, and suspending each part in the air with their telekinesis like Dr. Manhattan did during that one movie he was in. Talking to a machine telepathically or astrally projecting their mind into cyberspace. There is a lot of potential here.Looking at the Artificer struggling for Archetypes I'm somewhat inspired to do a "Technomancer" archetype that taps into Esperness to manipulate machinery and electronics directly...
For the record, I think you should consider changing the thread title if you've decided to remove entries that should qualify under the term "every archetype", especially if you're doing it for personal politics (as suggested by AI art being the issue).View attachment 346015View attachment 345120Do you find these charts useful? Consider buying me a coffee using the link below!
EDIT: As of Feb 13, 2024, to the best of my knowledge.
I would love to keep posting updates of this graph with 3PP, but I’ll need help, because I can’t afford every new supplement that comes out. I’m trusting the community here to let me know if there’s anything new.
Here's a spreadsheet with all of the known archetypes and where they can be purchased/found:
NOTE: I have decided to no longer track 3rd Party Publications that include AI-generated art.
Well, at present, there aren’t any archetypes excluded under the definition.For the record, I think you should consider changing the thread title if you've decided to remove entries that should qualify under the term "every archetype", especially if you're doing it for personal politics (as suggested by AI art being the issue).
Didn't you say earlier that you removed some? Or was that future-proofing?Well, at present, there aren’t any archetypes excluded under the definition.
I did, but the author reached out to me and demonstrated to my satisfaction that I had misunderstood the attribution page, so I added them back.Didn't you say earlier that you removed some? Or was that future-proofing?
Well, thank goodness!I did, but the author reached out to me and demonstrated to my satisfaction that I had misunderstood the attribution page, so I added them back.