W'rkncacnter
Hero
oh, i figured.yeah the why is more rhetoric because I just nearly broke my tired brain trying to figure through this magic item.
oh, i figured.yeah the why is more rhetoric because I just nearly broke my tired brain trying to figure through this magic item.
You can’t have both the dual-wielding and the two-handed properties. It seems the latter property was the mistake. The Double Weapon has a similar problem.Kusarigama (Japanese, 10 gold). This is a sickle on a chain. It uses the statistics of a sickle that weighs 5 pounds and has the dual-wielding, parrying immunity, reach (10 ft.), and two-handed properties.
The day this gets fixed is a sad day for small Queen Bee Berserkers, as it's the only weapon they can use to get brutal criticals with, without making the weapon heavy and thus getting disadvantage on all attacks (If you don't use the unofficial rule that got approved by the writer but is not yet in official errata.)There’s a contradiction in the weapon properties of the Kusarigama.
You can’t have both the dual-wielding and the two-handed properties. It seems the latter property was the mistake. The Double Weapon has a similar problem.
What is said unofficial rule?The day this gets fixed is a sad day for small Queen Bee Berserkers, as it's the only weapon they can use to get brutal criticals with, without making the weapon heavy and thus getting disadvantage on all attacks (If you don't use the unofficial rule that got approved by the writer but is not yet in official errata.)
That "Feel My Sting" lineWhat is said unofficial rule?
i'm pretty sure when the a5e.tools website says "magic resistance", it doesn't mean "resistance to magic damage", but rather is referring to the monster trait of magic resistance, which literally is just advantage on saving throws against magic (i.e. the exact same thing as what the AG says).Hey all, super quick question: There's a discrepancy between the book (both pdf and the physical copy) and a5e.tools, but but no mention of it in the errata. I'm not sure how to check if I have the most recent version of the books, or where to download it. Was hoping to get an official ruling here, since my party's Barb specifically took the feat thinking it was the website version
Spellbreaker (AG p. 394)
You have learned specialized techniques to fight against magic users more effectively. You gain the following benefits.
- You gain proficiency with the Purge Magic maneuver and do not have to spend exertion to activate it.
- When a creature concentrating on a spell is damaged by you, it has disadvantage on its concentration check to maintain the spell it is concentrating on.
- You have advantage on saving throws made against spells cast within 30 feet of you
Spellbreaker (A5E.tools)
You are a terrifying foe to enemy spellcasters.
View attachment 314458
- You gain proficiency with the Purge Magic maneuver and do not have to spend exertion to activate it.
- Targets forced to make concentration checks as a result of damage you deal suffer disadvantage .
- You gain magic resistance against all spells cast within 30 feet of you.
Personally I'm in favor of the AG wording, as it sounds a little insane to me that a feat can just, as I understand the wording, just make you take half damage from essentially all spellcasters that don't get the jump on you.