JohnSnow
Hero
So, I had a thought a while back that I wanted to share with the community.
It occurred to me after pondering the edition numbering for years that 3e was the game's 3rd-Edition in a lot of different ways.
First and most obviously, it was the successor to AD&D and AD&D: 2nd-Edition. That makes logical sense, and I think people mostly stop there and don't ponder the rest.
But it's also the "Third Edition" in a few other ways. Follow along with me if you will...
Way back in the bygone days of 1974, there was one "D&D," the original, or "White Box" game. In many ways, this was the first iteration (1st-Edition) before the game "split." The Holmes box was basically the same game. This continued until the late-70s, when the game split into two separate product lines: the boxed-set Moldvay "Basic/Expert Dungeons & Dragons" line and the hardcover "Advanced Dungeons & Dragons" line.
So, counting this way, OD&D/Holmes was the game's "1st-Edition," and the successive split into two product lines is the game's "Second Edition." The reintegration becomes 3e.
But you can take it even further, where the Basic/Expert Moldvay boxed sets (which were retooled by Mentzer) is the 1st Edition of "Dungeons and Dragons," (just like the 1e AD&D books are that game's "1st-Edition") and the expanded "Rules Cyclopedia" is the 2nd-Edition of THAT game.
Which makes 3e the successor to both. And explains why they dropped the "Advanced" name.
Anyway, I doubt WotC put that much thought into it, but I was woolgathering and thought it was an interesting observation.
It occurred to me after pondering the edition numbering for years that 3e was the game's 3rd-Edition in a lot of different ways.
First and most obviously, it was the successor to AD&D and AD&D: 2nd-Edition. That makes logical sense, and I think people mostly stop there and don't ponder the rest.
But it's also the "Third Edition" in a few other ways. Follow along with me if you will...
Way back in the bygone days of 1974, there was one "D&D," the original, or "White Box" game. In many ways, this was the first iteration (1st-Edition) before the game "split." The Holmes box was basically the same game. This continued until the late-70s, when the game split into two separate product lines: the boxed-set Moldvay "Basic/Expert Dungeons & Dragons" line and the hardcover "Advanced Dungeons & Dragons" line.
So, counting this way, OD&D/Holmes was the game's "1st-Edition," and the successive split into two product lines is the game's "Second Edition." The reintegration becomes 3e.
But you can take it even further, where the Basic/Expert Moldvay boxed sets (which were retooled by Mentzer) is the 1st Edition of "Dungeons and Dragons," (just like the 1e AD&D books are that game's "1st-Edition") and the expanded "Rules Cyclopedia" is the 2nd-Edition of THAT game.
Which makes 3e the successor to both. And explains why they dropped the "Advanced" name.
Anyway, I doubt WotC put that much thought into it, but I was woolgathering and thought it was an interesting observation.